moving memories from New York to Phoenix
10 Tuesday Sep 2013
10 Tuesday Sep 2013
26 Wednesday Jun 2013
Tags
Ambassador of Conscience, Amnesty International, Betty Williams, Graceland, Mairead Corrigan, Margaret Thatcher, Nelson Mandela, Nobel Prize, Paul Simon, Seamus Heaney, The Cure at Troy, The Peace People
Men and women, all over the world, right down the centuries, come and go. Some leave nothing behind, not even their names.
Nelson Mandela is gravely ill tonight with reports coming out of Pretoria, South Africa that he is on life support. He is at the end of his life, frail at 94, but in my mind’s eye, Mandela will forever be at the beginning of his journey as the free man who stepped onto the world’s stage in 1990 after spending 27 years behind bars.
In the darkest days of apartheid, no one – other than Mandela himself – could have imagined the man in that cell as the future President of his country, that he would one day stand among rock stars and royalty and popes and presidents to advocate for democracy and justice, to inspire a vision of peace that transcended race and creed, that he would matter to so many people and that he would make so many people matter.
Mandela mattered to me because he represented what could be. Like Martin Luther King‘s dream of what America could be and like the peace once envisioned for Northern Ireland by Betty Williams and Mairead Corrigan, Mandela’s vision of South Africa as a democratic rainbow-nation inspired the first all-race democratic election, moving more than 17 million black South Africans to vote for the first time. Such a sight to behold, even on a television screen on the other side of the world – a reminder that anything can happen, that Seamus Heaney‘s hope and history can rhyme.
In 1987 before I emigrated to the United States, I went to see Paul Simon’s Graceland tour in Dublin. The boisterous and beautiful performance sparkled on stage and sparkles still in my memory as one that transcended the ugliness of apartheid. Simon had been and is still widely criticized for performing in South Africa, but how I can fault him for accepting an invitation from black South African musicians to collaborate on some of the most hopeful and uplifting music ever created. Surely, that glorious music represented the “days of miracle and wonder” that were possible in the heart of Nelson Mandela or, years earlier, in the universal dreams of Martin Luther King. In accepting a Grammy award for the album, Simon said of his fellow musicians and friends:
They live under one of the most oppressive regimes on earth today, and still they are able to produce music of great power, nuance and joy, and they have my respect for that.
He was also one of the first people Mandela invited to South Africa. I imagine the smile on Mandela’s face, showing he was no longer in prison, not because the bars had been removed, but because he had left bitterness and rancor behind. Not everyone did. The late former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher had deemed Mandela a terrorist, speaking for most of her party. I remember well, when the Iron Lady took office, her strident refusal to enforce sanctions on apartheid while much of the world was doing so. Her policy of “constructive engagement” with the country’s white minority government polarized her such that when she died recently, there were reports of only a few tears shed in South Africa. As young university students in 1984, we were singing along with The Specials urging those who could to “Free Nelson Mandela.” How could we not? His release was a moral imperative, the right thing to do against a racist regime. We were young and full of hope for a better future, and through that lens, we saw Thatcher and others in her party as resolute in their support of white rule which seemed only to prolong Mandela’s imprisonment in that tiny cell.
On the other side of the argument, there were those, including De Klerk, who felt that “Thatcher correctly believed that more could be achieved through constructive engagement with his government than international sanctions and isolation of the South African government.” The truth lies somewhere in the middle, as it always does.
When Mandela walked out of jail, a joyous crack was heard all over the world. While enormous challenges lay ahead with, unthinkably, more blood spilled, eventually, apartheid would be taken down and De Klerk and Mandela, together, would rise up to be honored with the Nobel Prize for Peace for their shared vision of a South Africa without apartheid, a democratic nation, an example for other countries beleaguered by bigotry and bitterness, proof positive that it is possible to sustain humanity in a world defined by brutal divisiveness.
Amnesty International’s “Ambassador of Conscience” Award inspired by fellow Nobel Laureate, Seamus Heaney’s “From the Republic of Conscience,” was presented to Mandela in 2006. Fitting that Heaney was the first to congratulate Mandela thus: “To have written a line about ‘hope and history’ rhyming for Mr. Mandela in 1990 is one thing . . . to have the man who made them rhyme accept the Award inspired by my poem is something else again.”
I imagine Heaney is as vexed over the thought of a world without Mandela as I am.
When I landed in the republic of conscience
it was so noiseless when the engines stopped
I could hear a curlew high above the runway.
At immigration, the clerk was an old man
who produced a wallet from his homespun coat
and showed me a photograph of my grandfather.
The woman in customs asked me to declare
the words of our traditional cures and charms
to heal dumbness and avert the evil eye.
No porters. No interpreter. No taxi.
You carried your own burden and very soon
your symptoms of creeping privilege disappeared.
II
Fog is a dreaded omen there but lightning
spells universal good and parents hang
swaddled infants in trees during thunderstorms.
Salt is their precious mineral. And seashells
are held to the ear during births and funerals.
The base of all inks and pigments is seawater.
Their sacred symbol is a stylized boat.
The sail is an ear, the mast a sloping pen,
the hull a mouth-shape, the keel an open eye.
At their inauguration, public leaders
must swear to uphold unwritten law and weep
to atone for their presumption to hold office –
and to affirm their faith that all life sprang
from salt in tears which the sky-god wept
after he dreamt his solitude was endless.
III
I came back from that frugal republic
with my two arms the one length, the customs woman
having insisted my allowance was myself.
The old man rose and gazed into my face
and said that was official recognition
that I was now a dual citizen.
He therefore desired me when I got home
to consider myself a representative
and to speak on their behalf in my own tongue.
Their embassies, he said, were everywhere
but operated independently
and no ambassador would ever be relieved.
02 Sunday Jun 2013
Tags
Advocacy, cognitive fog, identity, infusion, metastatic breast cancer, Nancy's Point, national cancer survivors day, sentinel node, staging, Times of India, Van Morrison
it is the first Sunday in June, a day set aside to celebrate cancer survivorship. Did you know this “treasured worldwide celebration of life” has been on the calendar for twenty-six years? I wonder would I have been any the wiser had I not been diagnosed myself. So who is a survivor, and who do I think I am? At best, I am ambivalent.
According to the National Cancer Survivors Day website:
… a ‘survivor’ as anyone living with a history of cancer – from the moment of diagnosis through the remainder of life. National Cancer Survivors Day affords your community an opportunity to demonstrate that it has an active, productive cancer survivor population.
Was I surviving before I discovered the lump myself? Is that how we would describe my living – my life – before it was officially declared “surviving?” Is that the label we would ascribe to it, after pronouncing as cancer, the disease that flourished, undetected for as long as a decade, defying three mammograms, hiding in tissue no one had bothered to advise me was dense? Or is there another word for my pre-diagnosis living? A better word? Had I been a more active and productive member of the population before diagnosis and after surgery or during treatment? Is there something about the Arimidex I take every night at nine o’clock that makes me a survivor, or am I just an obedient patient?
On this day last year, I took an interminable trek through the internet, searching for the right word, and encountered a jarring Times of India headline: “National Cancer Survivors’ Day: Gutsy fighters took on cancer, and won.” Took on? Took on Cancer? Won? Those who have been killed by cancer, are they “less gutsy” than the rest of us? Those with metastatic breast cancer, what of them? As a country, we do a great job ignoring them altogether. Is it because they are losers in this breast cancer lottery? Is that what we would call them? Would we?
Of all the words that no longer connote for me what they once did, “survivor” is the one that leaves me entirely flummoxed. As I have mused previously, the diagnosis has forever changed certain words for me – “staging” I no longer immediately associate with the theater; “fog” I am more apt to attach to a state of cognitive loss than Van Morrison’s misty morning fog or the cloud that can obscure parts of Pacific Coast Highway as we head north in the summertime; and, “cure” is no longer the idiomatic “hair of the dog that bit you,” rather a confounding and elusive thing all wrapped up in a pink ribbon. “Mets” no longer the other New York baseball team, but a tragic abbreviation for metastatic breast cancer from which no one survives yet of all the millions of dollars raised for breast cancer research in this country, only 2% of it is directed to metastatic breast cancer.
Even “sentinel,” which was reserved, until cancer came calling, for a lonely cormorant perched on a post in the shallow waters of sleepy Morro Bay, I now associate with the first node to which cancer cells are most likely to spread from a primary tumor. Until one afternoon at the oncologist’s office, “infusion” had been something done to transform olive oil into a gourmet gift. But because I had turned left instead of right upon leaving, I missed the exit and instead found myself on the threshold of the infusion suite, a room I didn’t even know was there. Feeling as though I had intruded, I fled. But not before I had registered a row of faces of people sicker than I. In one microscopic moment, I made eye contact with a young bald woman and wondered if perhaps she was cold because, as I turned away, I noted a quilt on her lap. I turned away and thought of Shakespeare’s “enter fleeing” stage direction. Ashamed. Guilty.
Ironically, there was a moment last year, in response to a poignant and provocative piece of writing at Nancy’s Point, when I felt compelled to remark that somehow I was beginning to make some kind of order out of my life since cancer. Or my life with cancer. Or my surviving cancer. I wrote that I was learning to make room for it, to make sense of it no less. Well, that was a bit premature, wasn’t it? Cancer makes no sense at all.
So the headline from The Times of India troubled me. I do not feel gutsy. Nor do I feel like a winner. Nor am I comfortable with being described a survivor. What then? I am a cancer patient. I am in treatment. I am aware that my treatment, currently, does not impinge on my life to the extent that it would were the disease more advanced. If it progresses, that is.
A profound sense of guilt accompanies this awareness. Why? It confounds me and reminds me of growing up in Antrim, a small town in Northern Ireland. At a safe distance. Except the times our kitchen window shook because a bomb had exploded somewhere. Or the time when the bomb exploded outside Halls Hotel. Or coming back to her brother’s house in Belfast after a great Saturday night out with Sk’Boo playing at The Errigle Inn in Belfast, to find my friend Ruth’s car had been stolen and set ablaze as a barricade somewhere on the other side of Belfast. Or the time my brother, as a young journalist, was sent to conduct a harrowing interview with the heartbroken grandmother of three little boys who had been murdered
In May the Lord in HIs Mercy be Kind to Belfast, based on his interviews with the people who lived there, Tony Parker makes an unsettling but astute observation that those born and brought up in Northern Ireland have a mutual need to know, from the start, about a person’s background, so they can proceed in the dialogue, the longer relationship, without saying the wrong thing, “the wrong word.” The schools we attended, our last names, the way we pronounce an “H” all became clues to help establish “who we are,” and if we are to be feared. “Derry” or “Londonderry?” “The Troubles,” “the struggle, or “The Irish Question?” “Ulster” or “The Six Counties?” Between the turmoil in the country of my birth and cancer country, I find that myth features prominently, in particular the myth that victims have in some way, brought it upon themselves. Breast cancer? Didn’t you go for mammograms or do your monthly self-exams? Lung cancer? Oh, you must have been a smoker? Skin cancer? Didn’t you wear your sunscreen? It is a curious mix of sympathy and blame that engenders detachment.
The calendar takes on a new significance, too. The people of Northern Ireland could fill a calendar with anniversaries, those of Bloody Sunday, the bombing of Omagh and Enniskillen, Internment, the Twelfth of July. Most of us physically untouched by these, but changed nonetheless. Survived. The images are indelible. Iconic. Father Edward Daly waving a blood-stained handkerchief on a Derry street on Bloody Sunday, the carnage on Market Street in the heart of Omagh, orange sashes, bowler hats, Lambeg drums, and The Guildford Four. While I have personally passed just one “cancer anniversary”, I have already penciled in my two-year appointment in November. In the end, I suppose every day marks an anniversary of something.
On the question of language, there is no easy answer. Within terrorism, within cancer, and the respective wars waged against both, are words and phrases that sanitize and even glamorize the suffering and pain, that hide the horror and heartbreak visited upon ordinary people going about their daily lives.
I first fell upon the words of writer, Damian Gorman, some twenty years ago. I was channel-surfing in my living room in America and stopped on Channel 8 when I heard a voice from home, narrating Devices of Detachment, a “verse film” about the role of ordinary people like me during The Troubles. It has stayed with me for all these years, and resonates deeply through these ruminations on the complexities of cancer, the politics of its lexicon, its races and pink ribbons, the platitudes we use to keep the ugliness and horror of it – the mets – as far away as possible. He describes the bombs, bullets, the “suspect incendiary devices” all too familiar in 1980s Northern Ireland as far less deadly than the “devices of detachment” its people used to distance themselves from the violence. Aware of it, yet so removed.
We are, all of us, very good at “detachment,” aren’t we?
“I’ve come to point the finger I’m rounding on my own The decent cagey people I count myself among We are like rows of idle hands We are like lost or mislaid plans We’re working under cover We’re making in our homes Devices of detachment As dangerous as bombs.” ~ Damian Gorman
26 Sunday May 2013
Tags
bookcases, books, Burt Lancaster, closets, Doc Moonlight Graham, Ernest Hemingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Field of Dreams, George Eliot, Great Gatsby, Hollywood, James Joyce, Oscar Wilde, Red Badge of Courage, These Diversions: Reading, Virginia Woolf
While I have moved past the demise of the typewriter and the tape deck, the resurgence of the turntable reassures me that we will ever be entirely without our books. I love books. I love how they look, the way they feel and smell, and how it was that they came to be permanent fixtures on someone’s bookshelf. A minute or two spent scanning the contents of a bookcase can tell you much of what you need to know about the owner’s personality, pastimes, and passions. Sometimes, you’ll learn more than you intended, especially from those volumes bearing the tell-tale signs of wear, with dog-eared pages and chunks of underlined text and bold marginalia, some exactly what you’d expect from a pseudo-intellectual teenager giving the author a piece of her mind with lots of exclamation points and question marks. To this day, I read with a pen in hand. Making my marks in a book makes it mine, and whenever I take the notion, I can revisit those margins, return to my side of a conversation with the author and remember who I am.
Loving books is one thing, but it wasn’t until recently that I developed more than a passing interest in the physical space they occupy – my bookcases. Incongruously, a paperback copy of Thomas Hardy’s Return of the Native had, for sixteen years, leaned up against a second or third-hand copy of What to Expect when You’re Expecting passed along to me when I was, you know, expecting. For almost a decade, a copy of The Good Friday Peace Agreement signed for me by former Taoiseach John Bruton when he visited Arizona, was sandwiched unceremoniously between Bob Dylan’s Bringing it all Back Home LP and a large illustrated Beowulf (unfortunately not Heaney’s translation). It was time to bring some order.
As long ago as 1926, Hugh Walpole in “These Diversions: Reading” would have agreed:
I believe it then to be quite simply true that books have their own very personal feeling about their place on the shelves. They like to be close to suitable companions, and I remember once on coming into my library that I was persistently disturbed by my ‘Jane Eyre’. Going up to it, wondering what was the matter with it, restless because of it, I only after a morning’s uneasiness discovered that it had been placed next to my Jane Austens, and anyone who remembers how sharply Charlotte criticized Jane will understand why this would never do.
When it comes to arranging books on the shelves, I need someone with a critical eye and zero tolerance for those books she knows I haven’t read. Someone like my mother who, when cleaning out a closet – mine not hers, mind you – brings a take-no-prisoners approach. If it hasn’t been worn in a year, or if she discerns that it is hanging in there for “sentimental reasons,” (like she knit it for me or bought it for me in 1987), then it has to go in the big black trash bag which will then go to a charitable organization or a consignment store. I have often thought about hiring a professional to organize my closet, but I fear I will end up like one of those poor women on a reality program on The Learning Channel. Mortified, in my front yard, by the sight of the contents of my closet, my entire wardrobe, spread out on the grass, in the glare of a camera crew, and then judged by a TV audience and an energetic host hell-bent on figuring out how much good it would do me, if I stopped buying jeans, handbags, and blue dresses.
How I love a blue dress. Any shade will do – teal, robins-egg, navy, cobalt, azure, cerulean, turquoise, even cyan (although I only recognize it form Photoshop. And jeans. Also blue, the shade Cat Stevens was thinking about, I’m convinced, when he wrote in “Oh Very Young,“
And though your dreams may toss and turn you now
They will vanish away like your daddy’s best jeans
Denim Blue fading up to the sky
And though you want him to last forever
You know he never will
And the patches make the goodbye harder still.
I am beginning to remind myself of Alicia, the wife of Doc “Moonlight” Graham played by Burt Lancaster in the movie, Field of Dreams. Alicia loved blue hats, and the story goes that when Doc Graham died in 1965, his office closet was filled with all the blue hats he hadn’t yet given her. That scene in the film, when the old man at the bar is telling James Earl Jones the story about Alicia’s hats always makes me cry.
No, the literati are not coming to party at my house, but like Bella, friend of Independent columnist John Walsh, I am acutely aware that “your collection of books can say terrible things about you.” Unlike Bella, however, I don’t rub shoulders with celebrities of the publishing world, so I’m not sure why I’m worried about the absence – and inclusion – of certain books on my shelves, not the least of which is a blue hardbound 1984. Not the one by George Orwell – rather it is my diary from the same year, and it brings to mind Willy Russell’s Rita brilliantly portrayed by Julie Waters, as she shouts from the window of a train to Michael Caine’s Professor Frank Bryant, that wonderful line from Oscar Wilde‘s The Importance of Being Earnest, a play I was delighted to find, along with 20 brilliant comedies in a great first edition Cavalcade of Comedy at the 1996 VNSA booksale in Phoenix. I paid just two dollars for it.
“I never travel without my diary. One should always have something sensational to read on the train … Oscar Wilde”
I suppose it was the remake of The Great Gatsby that caused me to reassess the order of my books. Although my best friend is much younger than I am, she has an atrocious memory, and couldn’t remember the plot, not having read it since high school, which wasn’t that terribly long ago for her, all things considered. I had re-read it during my Post-Mastectomy Period (PMP), so Daisy and Nick, and Gatsby calling people “old sport” and all those lavish parties were still young and fresh in my head when the new movie came out. I recall a dinner during which we performed our post-mortem on the film and then ventured off into a discussion of F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway. To be fair, this was a superficial discussion – I had to admit to her that, I have never read anything by Ernest Hemingway. Never. I suppose to make me feel better, she told me she hated Charles Dickens. And then we both confessed that we hate Moby Dick. The floodgates opened. Next, I disclosed that I don’t like Les Miserables, and I even fell asleep during a performance of the musical version. I know. I’m treading dangerous waters now. It feels almost criminal to say out loud that the longest running musical leaves me cold, and downright treasonous to admit that I think James Joyce is, well, overrated. To my shame, I have never finished Ulysees, nor am I sure I ever really started it at its start, given the many beginnings within its pages. Of Joyce’s “Dubliners” I only like “The Dead,” and were it not for Brodie’s Notes, which I imagine are roughly equivalent to the American Cliffs Notes, I don’t imagine I could have answered a single question about E.M. Forster’s Room with a View or Howards End. I do not like Virginia Woolf either. I might even be a little afraid of her. I think the same might be true for George Eliot, who, until I was in college, I assumed to be male. Then there’s Jane Austen. I know. This is definitely sacrilege, but Emma wore me out, and I didn’t pick up Pride and Prejudice until my PMP (see above). Even then, in the lingering haze from three days of Dilaudid coursing through my system, I just couldn’t understand what was so great about Mr. Darcy. I have remained oblivious to what has been coined The Darcy Effect – there must be something wrong with me.
Since I’m telling the truth about my books as they sit there looking at me, waiting to be rearranged, I wonder, guiltily, if any of the fifth graders I taught almost thirty years ago remember that Spring morning when I announced the next class novel. Together, we would be reading Stephen Crane’s Red Badge of Courage. I passed out the books and began reading aloud. We soldiered through the first few pages, me reading with as much expression as I could muster, but we all knew the time was not right. Remembering I was in charge, I quietly told them to close their books and put them back on the shelf for another day (which never came that year). And, from my handbag, I pulled out my high school English textbook and read to them Liam O’Flaherty’s “The Sniper” instead, hoping that the last startling sentence of that story would teach all they needed to know about the tragedy of war. None of the parents complained that I had strayed from the curriculum and abandoned an American classic for an Irish short story, but then their children probably said “Nothing!” when asked what they did at school that day.
Even though I love listening to J.K. Rowling in interviews and agree with much of what she says about living and working, success and failure, I’m not sure why I never bought a Harry Potter book. Timing, probably. In the same way that Catcher in the Rye doesn’t work as well for a reader who has exited early adolescence. My daughter says she read the first in the Potter series and didn’t like, it. She didn’t tell me why, but I know the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. I remember she read “Under the Hawthorne Tree,” for her first official book report. She loved it. It is a book I recall with fondness from my childhood, the story of three children trying to survive the Irish Famine. She saw it in my bookcase, one of twenty books my mother collected for her, part of The Belfast Telegraph’s Children’s Collection, asked me about it, and knowing it would resonate with her sense of justice, I grabbed the opportunity to tell her about The Great Famine, knowing she is unlikely to learn about it in an Arizona classroom. As an aside, and somewhat ironically, a headline in the Belfast Telegraph, Children Turn Away From Books in Favour of Reading Electronically, made me appreciate all the more, that my daughter still reads books made of paper. Speaking of Belfast, I wonder why nobody thought to require To Kill a Mockingbird for GCSE O level English in the 1980s. Although the setting was a small Alabama town in the 1930s, many of us in Northern Ireland could have learned a thing or two about fairness and goodness – and about humanity – from Mockingbird, at a time when our country needed it so. Instead we trudged through Richard Church’s autobiography, Over the Bridge. Sheer bloody torture.
With all of this off my chest, I feel better about the books I have carried with me over the years, my Choice of Poets textbook, my collections of Heaney’s poetry, the little blue book of Irish Short Stories, out-of-print Belfast Reviews, and old Rolling Stone and Life magazines. Still, I wish John Walsh was here to help the way he did when called upon to edit his friend’s library:
I had to re-jig it, alphabetize it, eliminate the once-trendy, excise the cheesy and ill-advised, and bring together all the books that had been lying for years in bedroom, lavabo and kitchen and behind the sofa. My function was like that of Hercules cleaning out the Augean stables, until no trace of Paulo Coelho remained.
Walsh points out that a proper bookcase, one in a mature middle-class household, should contain only books. Reference books do not belong there; rather, their place is close to a desk, and poetry needs its own section. Now we’re on to something. Knowing that you can only eat the elephant one bite at a time, and inspired by My Ideal Bookshelf, I began to fix my bookshelves with a nod to the women who have helped me find my way in the world with good humor and a sense of home, and some Bob Dylan for good measure:
The sshh … I’m reading coffee cup just happened to be sitting there when my daughter rendered, by hand, this drawing for my 50th birthday. Next, I made a little section for Seamus Heaney. Naturally. The little Irish cottage was a gift to my father over forty years ago from the wife of a Professor Coyle who lived in a house named “One Acre” on the Belfast Road. She had decided, well into her sixties, (then considered ‘a big age’) that she would learn to drive. As a favor, my father taught her, as he did many people in my hometown, Antrim, and he never took a penny for doing so. Therefore, as a present, and knowing it would appeal to my father’s love of things found in nature, Mrs. Coyle painted the little cottage on an angular remnant of a spruce tree, the bark serving as an approximation of a thatched roof with smoke streaming from a turf fire. He passed it along to me some years ago, and it has been at home with my Heaney books ever since.
In a final coincidence, and with a flourish to end his day of transforming Bella’s library into a thing of beauty, John Walsh placed on her coffee table, “with a bookmark at page 397” a copy of Seamus Heaney’s Stepping Stones, a collection of conversations with my favorite poet. Impressive.
Stay tuned for an update on the state of my coffee table …
Update (but not about the coffee table)
I have written here before about Mr. Jones, my favorite teacher, the person who had such influence on my taste in music and books. In the kind of coincidence that happens only in real life, Mr. Jones was also my college friend Ruth’s daughter’s favorite teacher. All those years later …
And, perhaps as a sign of things moving forward in Northern Ireland, one of the books required for Ruth’s daughter’s GCSE English exam was To Kill a Mockingbird.
P.S. Summer Reading: 200 Books Recommended by TEDsters.