Tags
A Scandalous Woman, Arts & Entertainment, Awesome Women, Belfast, books, Edna O'Brien, Errigle Inn, Feminism, Girl rising, International Women's Day, Irish fiction, Kenny McDowell and Jim Armstrong, Letter Writing, Library, Memoir, mother daughter relationship, Northern Ireland, reading, religion, Sexism, Stranmillis Library, The Country Girls, The Stories of Frank O'Connor, Themes of childhood, William Trevor, Women and Careers, Writing
It is International Women’s Day, and I am mad at my brother. It might as well be 1974, the two of us in the back seat of our father’s yellow Honda Civic, cushions strategically stacked in the middle to stop us from hitting each other on the long drive to a campground near Loch Lomond in Scotland. In passing this morning, with an entire stretch of Atlantic ocean and a sizable chunk of the North American continent between us, I casually mentioned to him that I might just sit down and write a sentence or two about Edna O’Brien, my favorite writer.
She was the first woman to commit to paper anything that made any sense to me, and I love her. My brother scoffed at me and said if I planned to do so, I should also add a “Dislike” button to my blog. The very thought! For me, Edna O’Brien stands out as the first woman to lambast my country’s constraints on women, and in her own over-the-top life, she has flung the door wide open on what it means to be yourself. Live. In Person. Out loud. She makes me want to stand up and cheer her on, even more so because there’s part of me that worries about how lonely she might be at the end of a day. Maybe that’s because of a poignant scene in The Country Girls, when she describes Kate’s mother as she waves goodbye. But I’m projecting.
She was waving. In her brown dress, she looked sad, the farther I went, the sadder she looked. Like a sparrow in the snow, brown and anxious and lonesome.
When my brother reads this, I imagine he will find it dismal and depressing. Well, that’s the point, isn’t it? Grim. Ireland was grim. He went on to explain that he has little time for Thomas Hardy either, having written his dissertation on the women of Hardy’s novels. He had the nerve to describe The Mayor of Casterbridge, Jude the Obscure, and Tess of the D’Urbervilles as “a triptych of misery.” Out of Hardy’s entire body of work, my brother likes only one sentence, the one in which Tess’s mouth is compared to “snow-filled roses.” I, on the other hand, prefer the last line where he says something very melodramatic like “The Great President of the Immortals had ended his sport with Tess.” And that, as Mr. Jones, my English school teacher would have said, is “great stuff!”
While it was hard for me to argue against the drudgery of a dissertation on the Hardy women that most likely required a stiff drink at some point, I decided to, instead, point out that my brother was in fact the same youngster who read all Enid Blyton’s books, including the ones bereft of any boys. In his defense, he said that at least Enid could spin a yarn and get out while the getting was good. Edna O’Brien, however, is more apt to keep an argument going, coming back in the room, more than once, with, “Oh, and ANOTHER thing …” Well, of course Edna O’Brien would do that. I mean I do that. It’s very Irish as well as consistent with a perfectly natural and even charming forgetfulness. Right? What’s wrong with him? I may need smelling-salts before this is over.
As I was saying, I love Edna O’Brien. I own everything she has ever written and even some things that written about her, the latter not always favorable. I even saved the seven page hand-written paper I wrote about her in 1982 with the nice comment in red ink deeming it “A very perceptive, well presented and documented survey.” Mind you, I only got 75/100, which I swear was very good at the time, but by today’s standards, wouldn’t that be considered terribly mediocre? A “C” by any other name?
I suppose I should be thankful anything had been written about Edna O’Brien at all. To this day, she remains critically ignored in Irish literary history, as she was in 1982, when I informed my college tutor that Ms. O’Brien would be the subject of my dissertation on Irish Fiction Since James Joyce. He pointed out that it was entirely up to me, and good luck of course, but to bear in mind that, unlike Joyce’s body of work, Edna O’Brien’s fiction had not been the subject of “substantial critical inquiry.” Well, that was a bit unfair, but it was true, and Mr. Baird did not seem happy about it. So while everybody else was checking out dusty hard-back books about bloody Samuel Beckett and Sean O’Casey, I spent hours in the Stranmillis Library when it would have been easier to go to the Errigle Inn to hear Kenny McDowell and Jim Armstrong play than find a handful of words in a tattered periodical about Edna O’Brien suffering the same indignity as James Joyce and Frank O’Connor in having had her books banned. Her Country Girls, published in 1960, was banned for its ‘explicit sexual content,” content that offended a Catholic Church that has, of late, offended me infinitely more than Edna O’Brien ever did, and she was driven into exile. For words published in a book! Banished – as were all the very best Irish writers. What were they all so afraid of? I suppose we could take a look back to around the time O’Brien was born. In 1927, then Bishop of Ardagh had this to say about the danger to the “Irish” character:
In many respects, the danger to our national characteristic is greater now than ever. The foreign press is more widely diffused among us; the cinema brings very vivid representations of foreign manners an customs, and the radio will bring foreign music, and the propagation of foreign ideals.
Add to that the novelty of television and a new kind of popular press in the 1950s when a young Edna O’Brien began writing, and the same speech applies. To be Irish was to cleave to a certain set of values, to heed your elders, hold your tongue, and mind your manners. Edna O’Brien wasn’t having any of that. She was a different kind of woman, stepping up and out to challenge the Irish establishment that had so many of us tied in knots with our parents, priests, politicians. I would never have encountered this woman from County Clare, had it not been for Brian Baird who, in addition to reading the six o’clock news with gravitas on UTV every night, was my Tutor at Stranmillis University College Belfast. I will never forget him.
Some years later, I sent him a letter to say thank you. We should thank our great teachers. Too, I was about to teach an Irish literature class, and I wondered if Mr. Baird would share with me his course outline and a reading list. He obliged, and to this day, his letter and the list of works, remain carefully folded between pages 186 and 187 of the Collected Poems of Patrick Kavanagh.
It angers me to know that cancer took my Mr. Baird eight years after he sent me this letter. Cancer. There’s just no getting away from it. I hate it.
Mr. Baird, I would give anything to run in to you, just one more time, at The Lyric Theater on Ridgeway Street, just a few doors down from where I lived when I was a student. Before a play perhaps, as you are enjoying a cigar and a laugh with local playwrights, your thick gold bracelet chinking against a brandy glass as you raise it to one of your students on the other side of the lobby. This time, I would say hello and ask if he thought the play was going to be all it was cracked up to be. I would be like Edna O’Brien, unafraid and confident, with the voice she helped me find so I could move in a world where women are still struggling. Oh, Mr. Baird, I am still learning. When I wrote that essay for him, I included something Edna O’Brien had shared in an interview, and it resonates with me still:
You canot escape the themes of childhood . . . the bulk of the rest of our lives is shadowed or colored by that time.
You see, Edna O’Brien, unlike Yeats and Joyce and various other dead men, made me pay attention to my lot in life, the child I had been, and the young woman, the first in the family to “go away” to university. For years, our heads had been turned by The Troubles in Northern Ireland, our schools and the literature and history we studied, all segregated. Then in college, our heads were turned by Joyce, Beckett, and O’Casey, and I was sick of memorizing the poetry, although beautiful, of W.B. Yeats. Sicker of all the pseudo-intellectuals who tried to sparkle and enchant their way through lectures with ill-placed ironies by Oscar Wilde. But Mr. Baird also introduced us to Seamus Heaney whose poetry has saved me a time or two, and to Brian Moore. I loved Moore’s books as well – the Lonely Passion of Judith Hearne comes to mind, The Emporer of Ice Cream. Moore even tried his hand at writing as a woman in The Doctor’s Wife in the early 1970s. He did a good job too and received critical acclaim for his portraits of women “on the edge” as he did for his dead-on depiction of and disillusionment with the Belfast I loved. Still, I remember wondering why Moore’s books seemed were more “acceptable” than those of Edna O’Brien who didn’t have to “get into character” to be a real Irish woman writing about real Irish women, about the unwavering parochialism of Irish catholicism and the oppressive constraints of hard life in rural Ireland. She breathed it.
With both caustic wit and trademark humor, O’Brien held up to the light the limitations of a repressed Irish society that oppressed its women. At twenty-one, I don’t pretend that I knew anything about being a feminist, being a woman. But I knew that O’Brien’s voice was at once new and familiar. Finally, we could find in our libraries and bookshops, the words of a woman speaking about the constricting despair that holed up in the hearts of Irish women trapped in a paradigm of provincialism and parochialism. I remember how excited I was to share The Country Girls with my mother, telling her, “Read this, ma!” and knowing it would make her weep with sorrow and joy in equal measure, as she nodded her head in pure recognition. Edna O’Brien knew who we were. I understood more about Ireland from those books than anything else I learned in college. Finally, I understood who I was, and something about my mother and hers before her.
Too little time indeed. A Scandalous Woman published in 1974 is a collection of nine short stories, the title story ending with the author’s comment on the lot of Irish women, “I thought that ours indeed was a land of shame, a land of murder, and a land of strange, sacrificial women.”Such women weep, accepting their lot, knowing no other, for Ireland – lost for so long in struggles with invaders, with poverty, and with the land, has had too little time for the delicacy of polite society and leisurely relationships.
Looking back from where I sit in 2013 America, I wonder if this was perhaps more about the sacrifices of the first Irish feminists and if finally, we are embracing this country girl and her critique of the repressive Ireland that produced her.
On this International Women’s Day, it is sobering to realize that in the eighty years since Edna O’Brien’s birth, we are still fighting for equality, education, and empowerment for women. In Ireland. America. Africa. India. Everywhere.
When we make life better for our girls, we make life better for everyone.
When girls have equal opportunities to education and health; when they are safe and provided opportunities; the trajectories of their lives change in ways that can lift an entire community out of poverty. Think about it.
Invest in a Girl.
We are harming ourselves as a global community, men are harming themselves, by not investing in women.
Related Links:
Edna O’Brien, The Art of Fiction No. 82, Paris Review 1984 Interviewed by Shusha Guppy
Edna O’Brien, Reluctant Memoirist, The Times Literary Supplement 2012, Patricia Craig
Victoria said:
What a wonderful post. And a new author to discover. I don’t know Edna O’Brien but I think I’d like to make her acquaintance.
For International Women’s Day I would like to recognize three women (or groups of) that formed my thinking about feminism when I was younger and even today:
1. Lizzie was a woman I met when I emigrated back in 1989. She was an American woman who married a Frenchman and had lived in France since World War II. She was quite elderly when I met her and I think she died not too long after. She was so helpful and so kind and she listened to me as I struggled to integrate. She was an inspiration.
2. Emma Goldman. Those who argue that well things weren’t that bad for women in the recent past have only to read Goldman’s story and the context around it to understand how bad it really was. There was a time in most European countries like France and in the US where a woman’s nationality was tied to her husband. A woman in the US who married a foreigner saw her US citizenship stripped from her. Same was true in France. This was ostensibly to avoid the “evils of dual citizenship” but the end result went far beyond that. Some women literally became stateless because of these nationality laws. Emma Goldman was stripped of her US citizenship when her husband was denaturalized and she was deported becoming a “Woman Without a Country.” Those discriminatory nationality laws are a things of the past but the mentality that supported those laws is still alive and well today. You can see it very clearly when American women trying to get a hearing in Washington concerning how the US tax laws effect those of us who are married to foreign nationals and live outside the US get no hearing from either the American public or US lawmakers because they seem to feel that these actions SHOULD have terrible consequences for American women who dare to marry non-US citizens. We have been told that it is our fault (you brought this on yourselves) and we have only to give up our US citizenship if we don’t like the situation.
3. The Benedictines. When I was a teenager I was sent to a local Catholic girls’ school in a small priory in my hometown in the U.S.. It was an oasis of serenity and intellectual inquiry. The nuns were incredible and what an example they set – a self-sustaining community of women dedicated to nurturing young women and their talents. We were encouraged to write, to think and to go on to college. “God gave you a mind,” said one sister to me one day as I was thinking about universities. “Use it!” I could not have asked for a better start in life.
Sorry for the length of this comment. I will stop there and go off to Amazon and see what titles you have cited that I can get for my Kindle.
Editor said:
Never mind my brother 🙂 I think you’d love Edna O’Brien.
Do you still keep in touch with any of Lizzie’s family or write about her? Wouldn’t that be a great way to keep her ‘lessons’ and her legacy alive.
The school sounds like it was a really empowering community for you – probably, in some way, contributed to you feeling emboldened to make a life in a new country. Wow. “To be of no country.” is such a powerful statement. You know, I still have not become an American citizen. I just cannot put my hand on my heart and pledge allegiance to any country other than the one that shaped me as a child. The older I get, the stronger that feeling becomes. It’s all wrapped up with our identity, who we think we are, who we want to be, and these are questions for the soul so when they fall on bureaucratic ears, it’s little wonder so many of us are frustrated. I live in the US, and I pay taxes, so I think I should be able to vote, but I just cannot give up my citizenship.
I love the long comment!!!
“talk” to you soon
yvonne
Victoria said:
Oh this is too funny. Last night I had an email exchange with MY brother in the US about another author (interestingly enough an Irish one) that I thought he should read and he wasn’t having any of it. 🙂
To be or not to be a citizen – oh, yes, this is one I’ve struggled with myself. When I emigrated back in 1989 Americans were not allowed to be duals and so I did not become a French citizen. That has changed but, as you point out, it’s so much more than that. Given that we can do just about anything with a residency permit (except vote) it’s really matter of the heart. I’ve explored this in my blog over the years and there are two posts I offer to you that best explain my thinking and how it changed over time. The first is Always a Resident, Never a Citizen (http://thefranco-americanflophouse.blogspot.fr/2010/12/always-resident-never-citizen.html). The second is The Narcissism of Difference (http://thefranco-americanflophouse.blogspot.fr/2011/11/narcissism-of-difference.html).
If I can recommend a book that I think has one of the most thoughtful discussion about this that really changed the way I looked at it? Amin Maalouf’s In the Name of Identity. The first few chapters changed so much for me and his examination of identity is an interesting exercise. Really powerful.
Just for the record I am still not a French citizen. I got all the papers together (it took months) and then I was diagnosed. And since the rules have changed since the socialists came into power here so I need to head back yet again to the prefecture to see what I will need to get the process started. But that does bring up the question of what to do about my US citizenship. I can keep it but should I? Does my country of origin even want me to (and the answer to that seems to be “no”). These are, as you said, “questions for the soul.”
Editor said:
Oh, yes. It is such a fascinating, complex thing, this question of national or cultural identity and who will “claim” us. I will be heading over to your blog to read those posts for sure!!
I was thinking about the dual thing as well … because I was born in Northern Ireland, I can be Irish or British. Well, you can imagine how charged that issue is … I think you can have dual Irish and American but not Irish and British.
Intrigued by the Name of Identity book as well. I love delving into these issues. I know I’ve written about it a couple of times … the cancer thing adds a whole other dimension with the new language and the politics of the disease. We know that too well, right?
I love that you were having a similar conversation with your brother!!
Kathleen Hoffman, PhD said:
I have not been able to read your posts in so long. I am so grateful for you and your magnificent mind and generous heart. What incredible skill and wit carries your pen over paper (or whips your fingers over keyboard)! Every time I read your blog I learn and grow….
Through adversity we grow strong…this is true…but being able to speak up, to be heard–Seems that most of the time women use all that strength from adversity just to get through not being listened to….Does that make sense?
I thank God again and again for my incredibly strong mother, Edna, who kept speaking and made so much happen for her daughters! I thank God for you and for now another Edna, who inspired you.
Thank you for sharing this. I will try to be back soon for more of your incredible writing. Keep it going…
Editor said:
How great to see you, Kathleen!! I hope you’re doing well.
Thanks so much for the lovely compliment – from you, it is high praise that I cherish. Another Edna – oh, that is just perfect. I loved the beautiful post you wrote about your mother and your wedding – will never forget it and hope lots of people read it.
Thank you for visiting, Kathleen. Hope to “see” you soon
yvonne
lesleypr said:
Loved this Yvonne – makes me want to read her work all over again.
And tell your brother to “wise up”! 😉 x
Editor said:
I KNOW, Leslie!!! What is wrong with him?? 🙂
Keith Watterson said:
Ye gods, way to make me a whipping boy! Firstly, I didn’t scoff at you. You mentioned her, I said I didn’t enjoy reading her, and then it descended into a smart-arsed SMS exchange, in which I never would have engaged if I’d know you were going to repeat it verbatim to the www/blogosphere/whatever! But now that it’s out there, like so much toothpaste out of the tube, I will curb these recriminations, and instead clarify a couple of things.
Firstly, I don’t like Edna O’Brien’s work. Period. That doesn’t put me in league with patriarchy or the Catholic Church or anyone else. And I’m not pushing anyone’s buttons. It’s my own opinion. I enjoyed The Country Girls, but tried a few others, the titles of which escape me now, and found her writing severely grim. For me, life is too short to make any more time for Edna.
I feel no more compelled to ever again read a Thomas Hardy novel. I’ve given Hardy at least the benefit of some academic scrutiny, and sweated out several thousand words of a dissertation on three of his major novels. I’m not saying that this in and of itself makes my opinion worthy of anyone’s endorsement. I’m just saying that I’ve tried it and it’s not for me; certainly not for pleasure, anyway!
I think that’s about it, save to say that I enjoyed your post about what Edna O’Brien means to you, and I hope that you did indeed stand up and cheer during International Women’s Day; no more appropriate a date could there be for a celebration of one of your favourite writers. But in celebrating the first woman to “fling the door wide open on what it means to be yourself”, I think Edna herself would be inclined to give you a solid rap on the knuckles for publicly flogging someone who had the temerity to express an honest opinion on art; hers or anyone else’s 🙂
Editor said:
You’re right. You’re right. I know you’re right. Look – it could have been far worse – there are pictures of us in that Honda Civic that could have appeared as well. Oh … and you were way more smart-arsed than I was, because, well I can’t remember how to be. Oh, and I think we would definitely call it scoffing. And … I didn’t repeat EVERYTHING we said, because, OUR MOTHER reads this and that would be bad form!!
xoxoxoxo
Editor said:
P.S.
AND …. you did kind of laugh at me when I broke out what she said, “”Life was frugal and unpredictable, the harvests and the ripening hay subject to the hazards of rain and ruin” I thought it was beautiful, and then YOU SCOFFED with “yeah, I know, I know, the harvests, the rain, the ruin, the frugality… kerbooom!”
And then you brought up Thomas Hardy …
Dale said:
I don’t know what I enjoyed more… your fabulous writing about Edna O’Brien and what she meant to you or the repartee between you and your brother or all the comments…
I’ve some catching up to do in reading more of your blog!
jbaird said:
I’m proud to be Mr. Baird’s namesake. He sounded like a wonderful man. I am so sorry to learn he died of cancer, as have so many. Your essay to him is poignant, and I love the quote about childhood. So true, so true. Write on, Yvonne. You have an incredible gift. xox
Editor said:
Awww, thank you Jan!! That quote about childhood comes to me virtually every day. She just nails it. As I’ve grown older, I’m so pleased to be able to say that I think my life is much more brightly colored than shadowed by it 🙂
Hope this is a good week, jan.
xox
Marie Ennis-O'Connor (@JBBC) said:
How much do I love this! let me count the ways.
1. Laughing myself silly at you and Keith 🙂
2. You know I love Edna O’Brien – and I love the fact that I am living just a few miles down the road from where she was born and grew up in Scariff, Co Clare.
3. Tickled pink by the comments here, especially those who are just discovering the divine Miss O’Brien for the first time.
4. Ooh lots more reasons, but I have to get on with things myself today 🙂 so I will just conclude with a hearty “hear! hear!” to Kathleen’s comment “Every time I read your blog I learn and grow….”
Pingback: Weekly Round-Up: The Mother’s Day Special | Journeying Beyond Breast Cancer
Editor said:
Well, seriously, Marie. What’s wrong with him? Is there something in the water in Limerick?? And don’t even get him started about Maeve Binchy. Another dagger in the heart …
He’s going to kill me for posting that photo 🙂 but I have others and I’ll use them if he doesn’t behave himself.
Oh, divine is such a good word for her. I suspect she may be given to divadom but I don’t care. I love her.
xx
betty watterson said:
Yo Ho Yvonne some great wotk as usual, you never fail to make me laugh, really enjoyed so much , oh and my dear Brian Baird who I watched every evening reading the nrws, Hope you and Keith have had a good laugh..Keep writing and maybe an odd wee photo, xxxx
Editor said:
I LOVED Brian Baird. He always called me “the late Miss Watterson,” because I was always, you know, late. And he would always add at the end of his comments on my essays, “In spite of its lateness” 🙂
Editor said:
I think Keith may not forgive me for the photos 🙂
Pingback: words & music for st. patrick’s day every day | considering the lilies
Pingback: hindsight & happy birthday | considering the lilies
Editor said:
Reblogged this on considering the lilies and commented:
“Make It Happen” is the 2015 theme for International Women’s Day. Edna O’Brien has been making it happen for me since I first encountered her Country Girls, many years ago.
I wrote this for her last year, and it still applies . . .
jbaird said:
So eloquently expressed. Sorry my namesake Mr. Baird died of cancer.
I wish I could say that women’s rights have come a long way in America, but it isn’t really that true. Patent attorneys with advanced chemistry degrees, as I was up till recently, are almost as rare today as they were when I started in the 1970’s. You are a great advocate and I hope your words resonate around the world to inspire change. x
The Accidental Amazon said:
Hah! Edna sounds like my kind of woman! I missed this the first time around, so I’m glad you reposted it. Going to look her up, for sure…
Editor said:
Oh, she is TOTALLY your kind of woman. xo